U.S. Court Strikes FCC Indecency Policy

On July 13, the U.S. Court of Appeals for 2nd Circuit declared the Federal Communications Commission’s indecency policy to be unconstitutional. The opinion was rendered in the Fox Television Stations v. Federal Communications Commission case that had worked its way to the higher court.

Patrick A. Trueman, former chief of the U.S. Department of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section in Washington, D.C. said :

quoting A ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for 2nd Circuit today declaring unconstitutional the Federal Communications Commission’s indecency policy seems foolish on it face … How is the American public to understand that federal judges don’t know that use of the “F-word” is indecent during prime-time television?” end quote

This ruling only increases the public’s belief that government is out of touch with the public and out of step with the U.S. Constitution, Trueman added.

The court found that FCC policy was, “unconstitutionally vague” and creates a “chilling effect” on broadcasters. Trueman said,

quoting There is nothing vague about federal indecency law which has been in effect for decades and has always been though to prohibit the “F-word on primetime television. “Broadcasters will have a green light to pump indecent language and perhaps much more into the homes of families at will.
     
Rock singer Bono has no more right to shout, “f***ing brilliant” in the homes of unsuspecting American families than we would have in his … He made himself an uninvited guest of those families that believed honorees at the Grammys would respect the norms of civilized discourse on broadcast television. Similarly, the indecent comments of singer/actress Cher and actress Nicole Richie are out of place in the homes of those families who thought that network television represented a safe haven for family viewing. end quote

Trueman represented the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family in filing a “friend of the court” brief in this case; Fox Television Stations v. Federal Communications Commission. He is currently heading up the War on Illegal Pornography, a national coalition effort to get federal laws against illegal adult pornography enforced. His websites include pornharms.com and www.youtube.com/user/PornHarms.

Read: Fox Television Stations v. Federal Communications Commission voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/indecency.pdf

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.