Why IBM didn't restrict distributon of DOS
I always wondered why IBM didn't sign an exclusive contract with Microsoft.
This web article called
Chronology of Personal Computers probably gives two clues.
January 1952
A complaint is filed against IBM, alleging monopolistic practices in its computer business, in violation of the Sherman Act. (The government's antitrust investigations and trial against IBM will drag on for thirty years, finally being dismissed in 1982. IBM will cautiously monitor its microcomputer business practices, fearful of a repeat of government scrutiny.) [569.138] [1298.186]
January 1956
A U.S. District Court makes a final judgement on the complaint against IBM filed in January 1952 regarding monopolistic practices. A "consent decree" is signed by IBM, placing limitations on how IBM conducts business with respect to "electronic data processing machines". (Though personal computers are twenty years in the future, this consent decree will limit IBM's success and ability to compete in the marketplace.) [569.138]
I guess others have known all along, but this is new to me.
I found this site while exploring the
Internet Public Library . You may want to check it out as well.
------------------------------
Found something really cool?
We'd love to hear about it and pass it along to all of our readers... just contact Lynn or Fred, or post your own review at our : review input forms------------------------------
